Week 4-2 Post
1. Week 4-2: Leave a 30-word micro session summary.
Two
teaching approaches are consultative and traditional teaching. The former
emphasizes student autonomy and varied teaching activities. The latter focuses
on objective-based lectures and passive learning. Some examples of
instructional strategies for creative thought in consultative teaching are
brainstorming, role plays, and semantic webbing. The consultative teacher
understands that everyone learns differently, and not all strategies will be
equally effective all the time.
2.
To some extent my college classroom learning experience has helped
me develop higher-order thinking. Writing research papers and analyzing books
or films in terms of major themes (e.g., politics, gender, race, etc.) has
allowed me to develop creative and critical thinking abilities. Also, classes
that utilized different technologies, such as online blogs or iPads in the
classroom, help me evaluate information with my peers. However, I primarily did
these in my social sciences class and not in my math or science classes. These
classes were mostly lectures and exams. In large introductory classes the
professor also just lectured and gave exams and quizzes.
3.
Yes, I do believe that
consultative teachers are more likely to incorporate various instructional
strategies because they understand individual learning needs and the importance
of knowledge through problem solving processes. Consultative teachers use many
resources besides textbooks to teach their students and try to incorporate
real-world tasks. They use a variety of strategies to encourage higher-order
thinking. Traditional teachers focus on lecturing information to students and
passive learning. There doesn’t seem to be a lot of room for critical and
abstract thinking. Students don’t have as much independence to problem-solve
and become responsible for their learning. I understand the importance of a
structured curriculum, but traditional teachers don’t force students to engage
in critical and creative thinking or discovery learning.
4.
Brainstorming allows students to engage in higher-order thinking
together. A teacher can monitor the lesson, but it is the students who are
brainstorming. This strategy is the process of coming up with multiple ideas
without judgment. Once the maximum amount of ideas has been made, students
analyze and decide which ideas or solutions are best. The group makes a final
plan of action. This strategy helps students express their ideas without
judgment and decide how to come to a solution together. Brainstorming helps
develop creative thinking because it is flexible and ideas must be organized in
the end to find a consensus amongst the group. It also allows for originality
because students are just “throwing out ideas.” They can bounce ideas off each
other and build on each other, which encourages peer learning. Students can
develop their creative thinking skills because all ideas are accepted and
everyone feels part of a team. This increases confidence to participate. This
strategy is also relatively easy in the sense that it's not a complex strategy
and there aren't many rules to explain. It helps the group take an unstructured
problem, explore it, and to come to a consensus in a fun and exciting way.
5.
Summing up is the technique of integrating, categorizing, and summarizing
information. This strategy requires students to research, review, and summarize
information on their own instead of the teacher just giving them all the
material. Students should be responsible for their learning and try to grasp
the important information. I know from experience that it takes critical
thinking skills to paraphrase information and write the material in my own words.
Critical thinking involves distinguishing relevant from irrelevant facts, which
is necessary for summing up information. Students needs to identify
relationships and present them in a succinct way. They need to make appropriate
conclusions when summarizing information and make sure information sources are
credible. Summing up can apply to any class, and in the end, helps students
have a deeper understanding of the material.
6. Do you have any
questions or concerns about course learning?
None this week!
7. Week 4-2 Activity Completion
Check
(Copy and paste the table below into your blog refection)
|
|
Modules
|
Topics
& Activity
|
Check ✓ if Completed
|
|
Week
4
|
Week 4-2
|
1)
Week 4-2 Reading Quiz
|
✓
|
|
2)
Week 4-2 Discussion Forum: One initial response & two peer feedback
replies
|
✓
|
||
|
3) Week
4-2 Personal Blog Reflection
|
✓
|
#8. Social Blog Activity
Miranda Singer’s
Blog
Hi Miranda,
Great summary of
student-centered learning and direct instruction. I like your point that the
videos over-estimated teacher-centered learning. I think this type of learning
has a place in the classroom and has benefits, it just shouldn’t be the only
learning style in a classroom. You had some nice ideas about collaborative
learning too.
Thanks for
sharing!
Elizabeth
Maureen Pflomm’s
Blog
Hi Maureen,
Great summary of
teacher-centered learning. I like your point about teacher-centered instruction
in your history class. For learning facts in a straightforward way,
teacher-centered learning can be effective. But you’re right that this type of
learning will not work for all classes. A literature class requires students to
interpret information and collaborate. You had some nice ideas about
project-based learning too.
Thanks for
sharing!
Elizabeth
Hi Elizabeth-
ReplyDeleteDespite being a science major and having taken many science and math classes, I've had similar educational experiences to you with respect to higher-order thinking being promoted in these types of classes. However, I've also been fortunate enough to have had similarly positive experiences in some of my other classes, such as when I wrote a term paper for my Sociology of Antisemitism course that required significant synthesis of information from a variety of sources.
I also think that consultative teachers are more likely to implement instructional strategies, but think that there may be another reason for this as well, the reason being time. As you suggested, traditional teachers tend to be more rigid in their instruction, and are more prone to having strict timing for their lesson plans as a result. As these instructional strategies not only may be difficult to time manage, but also may be considered a waste of time in the first place, they're much more likely to be implemented by consultative teachers.
I think your descriptions of both brainstorming and summing up were great, and really thorough. In the brainstorming example especially, I appreciate how you connected originality to "throwing out ideas," as this was an analogy that I previously had not considered. Thanks for sharing!
-Matt